3.4 KiB
Rayforge external binary-driver addon spike
- Date: 2026-10-18
- Upstream:
barebaric/rayforge - Commit:
c28918c87f8273dd1d244f5a057addc192807fa5 - Rayforge addon API: 23
- Scope: Windows, external addon lifecycle, no device or transport
Result
An external addon loaded through Rayforge's real AddonManager and registered
PirateRayJCZNoDeviceDriver. The driver declares uses_gcode = False, has no
discovery specification or transport, and returns a recognizable binary test
payload from an OpsEncoder.
The following lifecycle completed twice with identical JSON results:
- load the external addon;
- resolve the driver by class name;
- create its binary encoder and verify its payload;
- disable the addon and verify driver removal;
- re-enable it and verify re-registration;
- reload it and verify there is exactly one registry entry;
- package its three source/manifest files into a ZIP; and
- disable it cleanly.
The two result files had SHA-256
610f8f191526afe4685f8659c1ef2b34fac3c68a8f8088d77ca5e1fdd6080bfc.
The checked result is tests/fixtures/rayforge-addon-spike.json.
Registration seam finding
Rayforge's addon hook specification still exposes
register_machines(machine_manager), but the inspected startup registration
table does not invoke that hook, and MachineManager has no method for adding
a driver class. The source-level driver registry instead exposes
rayforge.machine.driver.register_driver(driver).
The working spike therefore registers during import of the addon's worker
entry point and removes its class in on_unload. This survives load, disable,
enable and reload, but it relies on mutable module-level registry internals for
cleanup. Before a production addon, Rayforge should ideally expose a dedicated
addon-aware driver registry hook with supported unregister behavior.
Reproduce
Create an isolated environment containing Rayforge's non-GUI runtime driver dependencies, then run:
python scripts/spike_rayforge_addon.py C:\path\to\rayforge
The script refuses any Rayforge revision other than the pinned commit.
What this proves
- An external addon can load a binary, non-G-code driver without patching the Rayforge source tree.
- Its worker entry point is sufficient in headless mode.
- The driver can remain completely free of discovery and transport.
- Addon load, disable, enable and reload work when registration and cleanup are handled explicitly.
- The addon itself can be packaged as a deterministic set of files on Windows.
What remains open
- The ZIP check is addon packaging, not a proof that a complete PyInstaller or MSIX Rayforge build discovers an externally installed addon.
- The current registration seam is functional but not a stable, addon-aware API. Upstream feasibility should be assessed before relying on it.
- No JCZ command encoding, machine profile, UI, project reload, discovery, transport, controller status or cancellation is implemented here.
- Nothing in this spike authorizes USB access, galvo movement or emission.
Decision impact
Spike B is a qualified go: the external binary-driver boundary is viable
without a Rayforge core fork, but registration lifecycle support should be
made explicit upstream. The next technical proof is Spike C: translate a tiny
Rayforge Ops stream into a deterministic no-I/O JCZ trace and compare its
semantics with the pinned BalorMK mock trace.